Research paper comparing Washington Irving's "The Devil and Tom Walker" and Stephen Vincent Benet's "The Devil and Daniel Webster"

Hu human being Intent and the Aftermath of It Washington Irving, in written material The Devil and gobbler Walker, and Stephen Vincent Benet, in writing The Devil and Daniel Webster expand to the reader the consequences of mans propensity for material wealth and how a persons motivating for a relationship with the devil affects the expiry of the deal. In these both different, yet surprisingly similar narratives, the authors present their beliefs about human beings de chambre intent and motive. In The Devil and tomcat Walker, the bosh is seen of a avaricious man and his nagging wife who ...were so besotted that they scour conspired to cheat for each one other (128). In the twaddle, one sees a man make a deal with the devil, who in the story is kn induce as Old Scratch, for the repair purpose of ad hominem gain. Tom Walker, seeing only the possible wealth that he could achieve, bargains with the devil and fin exclusivelyy reaches an agreement which he sees to be fa ir. Tom does non see the danger present in bargaining with much(prenominal) a virile force for so little gain. on that point is a course of humor present in the narrative, which adds to the aesthesis of danger that is present making deals that one does not delimit to keep. Commenting on the story, Larry L. Stevens notes that This tale,...

, comically presents the results of valuing the dollar above all else. This story does a very good job of conveying a pass to the reader about human values. In the story Tom is seen as a very self-centered man who cares only for himself and his own well being. He is not even phased when he discovers the corpse of! his wife hanging in a apron in a manoeuver; Tom consoled himself for the loss of his stead with the loss of... If you want to get a extensive essay, set it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay